Advertisement 1

GM must face class actions over defective transmissions: judge

The automaker now finds itself up against a multi-state lawsuit over its eight-speed automatics allegedly shuddering and shaking

Article content

A federal judge in Detroit certified class-action lawsuits for drivers in 26 U.S. states who accused General Motors of producing faulty transmissions for about 800,000 vehicles from the 2015 to 2019 model years. Monday’s decision by U.S. District Judge David Lawson covers several Chevrolet and GMC trucks and SUVs, several Cadillac models, and the Chevrolet Corvette and Camaro, equipped with 8L45 or 8L90 eight-speed automatic transmissions.

Advertisement 2

Story continues below

Article content

Drivers said the transmissions cause vehicles to shudder, and cause “harsh shifts” including hesitations, lunges, lurches, and making them feel as though they had been rear-ended. The drivers said GM knew about the defect before selling the vehicles, which they would not have purchased had they known.

In his 60-page decision, Lawson said drivers on a state-by-state basis showed that common issues predominated and it would be more efficient to sue Detroit-based GM in groups. Individual lawsuits could prove more costly to the plaintiffs and reduce potential recoveries.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Class-action verdict sees GM pay out over 100 million dollars

    Class-action verdict sees GM pay out over 100 million dollars

  2. Ford could pay out US0 million settling transmission class-action lawsuit

    Ford could pay out US0 million settling transmission class-action lawsuit

Advertisement 3

Story continues below

Article content

The judge also found substantial evidence that the automaker had “rapidly accumulated irrefutable evidence of a widespread defect as a result of a years-long – and apparently still ongoing – investigation” without telling drivers.

GM declined to comment on Wednesday, saying it does not generally discuss pending litigation.

In opposing certification, GM said there was no proof that all class members were injured, and some vehicles exhibited no problems. Lawson said GM waived its right to arbitrate some claims by seeking rulings from him.

The case is Speerly et al v General Motors LLC, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, No. 19-11044.

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Join the Conversation

POPULAR VEHICLE COMPARISONS